Giving Compass' Take:
- Amy McCaig reports on how homeowners in predominantly white communities would prefer to move to similar communities with more flood risk than more racially diverse communities with less flood risk.
- Why is this the case even after white homeowners have already experienced flood damage to their homes? How does this behavior contribute to de facto segregation?
- Read more about the role of race in relocation after flood damage.
What is Giving Compass?
We connect donors to learning resources and ways to support community-led solutions. Learn more about us.
Even after suffering flood damage, homeowners in mostly white communities prefer to accept higher risk of disaster repeating itself over relocating to areas with more racial diversity and less flood risk.
According to a new study in the journal Environmental Research Letters, researchers tracked where nearly 10,000 Americans sold their flood-prone homes and moved through the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Hazard Mitigation Grant Program—the largest managed retreat program in the country—between 1990 and 2017.
The data included address-to-address residential relocation information, flood risks of different addresses, community-level racial and ethnic composition, average housing values, and more.
“We found that across the US, the best predictor of the risk level at which homeowners voluntarily retreat is not whether they live in a coastal or inland area, or whether they live in a big city or a small town,” says James Elliott, professor and chair of sociology at Rice University. “It is the racial composition of their immediate neighborhood.”
He and coauthor Jay Wang found that homeowners in majority-white neighborhoods are willing to endure a 30% higher flood risk before retreating than homeowners in majority-Black neighborhoods, after accounting for the various types of areas people live in (coastal, urban, rural, etc.).
Read the full article about homeowners relocating after flood damage by Amy McCaig at Futurity.