The relationship between a funder (or philanthropist) and a frontline charity should be one of mutual gain—both working towards social impact. The frontline charity is more likely to know what needs to be done to solve global problems and the funder facilitates this through their support, this is trust-based philanthropy in action. 

But if you’re used to giving with restrictions, how can you move towards a more unrestricted model? 

Due diligence 

It all starts with having clear criteria for who you want to fund and why. Doing more work upfront, means less work later.  

The kind of things you will want to understand about prospective charities are: 

It’s ok to ask questions. Your aim is to build a good understanding of the charity, what drives them, and how they operate. So that when you do fund them, you can genuinely say that you trust them to spend that money wisely. 

Funding on a spectrum 

The levels of restriction you put on funding can be considered along a spectrum: from inputs, to outputs, to outcomes and finally to impact. 

If your organisation isn’t quite ready to give fully unrestricted funding, consider where along this spectrum you would feel more comfortable. 

For example: 

Reporting 

Funding without restrictions can reduce your administrative burden. You don’t need long reports with lots of questions. Instead, you can ask three simple questions: 

Trust on both sides 

There are complicated power dynamics between frontline charities and those who fund them. It can be easier to surrender to a funder’s requests than to deliver what might actually be needed on the ground. 

Read the full article about funding with few or no restrictions by Hannah Kowszun at NPC.