The history of mental healthcare is closely intertwined with human rights violations, incarceration, and a lack of patient-centred approaches. A ‘community-centric’ approach has often been offered as an alternative to this, but what does that really mean in the context of mental healthcare?
In the 1950s, ideas around deinstitutionalisation began to gain popularity. Facilitated by lower government budgets, the rise of psychopharmacology, and protests against human rights abuses, asylums were slowly replaced by community mental health.
Community mental health is a decentralised system of mental healthcare. When envisioned, it was based on the premise that those who required psychiatric treatment would enjoy a higher quality of life and have better chances of recovery if they were treated in their own communities. Ideally, it is an accessible and responsive local framework, based in a variety of community settings that use referrals to link users to a range of social services.
Coinciding with activism from user-survivors, this community care narrative rings with notes of liberation, human rights, and ethical user-centred care. However, many lived experiences of community mental health testify to certain critical gaps.
We must be cautious not to replicate, in community spaces, the old, top-down, biomedical approaches and power hierarchies of the asylum. Here’s a few ways in which we can do so.
- Centre the individual and their narrative
- Look beyond physical spaces as sites for care
- Move away from a recovery-focused approach
- Recognise identity as a factor for mental distress
Read the full article about mental health by Amalina Kohli Dave at India Development Review.
If you are looking for more articles and resources for Mental Health, take a look at these Giving Compass selections related to impact giving and Mental Health.
Are you ready to give?
If you are ready to take action and invest in causes for Mental Health, check out these Giving Funds, Charitable Organizations and Projects related to Mental Health.