Giving Compass' Take:
- Tiana Herring explains how inattention to inflation makes it much easier than it should be to classify someone as a felon in the U.S. criminal justice system
- How does such oversight disproportionately affect members of marginalized communities? What is your role in pushing for equitable systems change in the U.S. criminal justice system?
- Learn more about what you can do to reform the U.S. criminal justice system.
What is Giving Compass?
We connect donors to learning resources and ways to support community-led solutions. Learn more about us.
Each state sets a statutory definition of which thefts are felonies (punishable by longer sentences in prison) and which are misdemeanors (punishable by shorter sentences in jail). But in many states, the dollar amount separating felony theft from misdemeanor theft has not been increased in years, even though inflation makes the older laws more punitive each year.
These limits vary from New Jersey (a $200 theft is a fourth-degree felony) to Texas and Wisconsin where a theft must be worth $2,500 before you can get a state prison sentence. New Jersey’s limit is so low because it is one of the oldest in the country — it remains unchanged from when it was originally enacted in 1978. Only one state — Alaska — automatically adjusts the felony theft threshold with inflation.
Updating felony theft statutes is one simple way to reduce the number of people serving time in prison for low-level offenses. Making more minor thefts into misdemeanors will also spare more people from the often lifelong collateral consequences of felony convictions that can limit their access to public housing, welfare benefits, and even voting.
Read the full article about inflation in the U.S. criminal justice system by Tiana Herring at Prison Policy Initiative.