Paul Ehrlich on The Population Bomb, 50 Years Later

Climate One May 3, 2018
This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
Click here for more.
Paul Ehrlich on The Population Bomb, 50 Years Later Giving Compass

Giving Compass’ Take:

• Paul Ehrlich discusses The Population Bomb 50 years after its original publication, sharing why he believes the population situation is even more dire today.

• What are the most effective ways to sow population growth without infringing on personal freedoms? How can food supplies be more equitably distributed? 

• Learn about the importance of sustainable farming in feeding the global population. 

This year marks the 50th anniversary of Paul and Anne Ehrlich’s seminal best-seller, The Population Bomb. The book warned of the dangers of overpopulation, including mass starvation, societal upheaval, and environmental ruin.

Greg Dalton:  And one of the critiques of the book is often that it is overly dark it’s doomsday and what would you say that today?

Paul Ehrlich:  It’s much darker today.  And you can prove it. In other words, there’s no — after all, we were worried then about the problems of feeding human society when there was 3 1/2 billion people on the planet.  Since then, something on the order of 200 to 500 million people have starved to death or died of nutrition-related illness. Now we’ve got way over 7 billion people. We have something on the order of 800 million that’s more than double the population of United States, hungry and starving and another billion or two who are micronutrient malnourished. And people will say well, we don’t have any food problem.  Well, the people saying that, of course, usually don’t.

Greg Dalton:  Some organizations, Oxfam included, say that the world produces enough calories.  It’s a matter of distribution, getting them to the right place. Is that your view?

Paul Ehrlich:  At the moment that’s probably true.  That is if we did everything right and distributed things fairly, then everybody can have a decent diet.  Of course, what do we distribute fairly? In places where there’s a lot of hunger the food isn’t distributed fairly because the father has to get more than the kids or everybody starves.

Read the full article about The Population Bomb at Climate One.

If you are looking for more articles and resources for Climate, take a look at these Giving Compass selections related to impact giving and Climate.

  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    Impact Investing in Small Farmer’s Needs and Finances

    Peter Makasi's crop yields were small, and the family often had to ration food to survive until the next harvest. He knew his land could be more productive, and that he could stave off hunger for his family, if only he had access to better-quality inputs. In 2009, Peter joined One Acre Fund, a nonprofit organization that provides smallholders with high-quality inputs on credit, without the need for collateral, along with training on proven farming techniques to increase crop yields. Soon, Peter’s harvest increased sixfold — enabling his family to have plenty to eat year-round. With his additional income, Peter has been able to pay school fees for his children and grandchildren, buy solar lights for his house and purchase chickens and ducks for his farm. More than 450 million smallholder farmers in Africa, Asia, and Latin America lack access to financial services, with an estimated $200 billion in unmet needs for credit worldwide. It is possible, and often profitable, for financial institutions to reach them. To do so, practitioners need to tailor their services with farmer-specific risks in mind. AMK MFI Plc, part of the Agora Microfinance network has been doing this since 2006. Instead of requiring farmers to borrow all at once and repay in regular installments or lump sums at the end of a loan term, the company began offering a flexible disbursement and repayment option, allowing farmers to draw down the loan in parts and also make repayments whenever they had cash on hand. Farmers are often considered risky customers because many factors that influence their productivity and income — But that doesn’t mean that investing in farmers isn’t worthwhile. It is possible to offer sustained, long-term investment to smallholder communities even in difficult years. The key is to place clients’ needs at the center of business decisions and respond quickly to problems. Read the full article about impact investing in small farmers by OneAcre at ImpactAlpha.

Are you ready to give?

If you are ready to take action and invest in causes for Climate, check out these Giving Funds, Charitable Organizations and Projects related to Climate.

Loading...
Learn More

Sign in

Your personal information is confidential at Giving Compass. For more information, please visit our privacy policy. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use.