Reducing Childhood Trauma Through Home Visiting

This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
Click here for more.

Reducing Childhood Trauma Through Home Visiting | Giving Compass

Today’s generation of children is experiencing more childhood trauma than their parents’ generation.

They may be in homes with abuse, neglect, drug and alcohol use, mental illness, and domestic violence. They may have had their family life rocked by divorce, or a family member die, deported or sent to prison.

These stressful and traumatic experiences within the family in the first 18 years of life are called Adverse Childhood Experiences or ACEs. The effects of ACEs can start early and last a lifetime, showing up as development, academic, health and behavior issues. And they can lead to ACEs for a new generation. Parents who had high numbers of ACEs are 14 times more likely to be coping with life in ways that make ACEs for their children.

But trauma does not have to determine destiny. We now understand how adversity becomes embedded into biology, behavior and risk, and how simple supports and opportunities can deliver stunning improvement in peoples’ lives.

Philanthropy is a complex topic, and others found these selections from the Impact Giving archive from Giving Compass to be good resources.

This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
Click here for more.

How To Help Animals More Effectively

In our work to identify the most effective ways to help animals, ACE employs both qualitative and quantitative strategies. One way that we evaluate programs (or groups of programs) quantitatively is by assigning numerical values to their immediate costs and benefits in order to model their cost effectiveness. There are a few reasons why the conclusions we draw from animal advocacy research are often highly uncertain: There are still relatively few studies investigating the impact of any given intervention. Animal advocacy research is often underfunded, which may lead researchers to choose small sample sizes, resulting in studies that lack the necessary statistical power to detect the effects in which we are interested. Perhaps because of funding limitations (and perhaps because of lack of expertise), animal advocacy researchers sometimes choose not to use control groups—which may limit the causal conclusions that can be drawn from their research. Animal advocacy researchers are often invested in particular outcomes. For example, they may desire to find that particular interventions are effective. As a result, animal advocacy research may be subject to various sorts of bias. Animal advocacy researchers are often unable to directly measure the outcomes in which they are most interested, such as changes in participants’ behavior. Research on the effects of animal advocacy interventions often relies on data that is self-reported by participants. Self-reported data is subject to social desirability bias and other sources of error. Assigning numbers to uncertain values allows us to be clear about the effects we expect an intervention to have. It allows our readers to identify specific points on which they may disagree. If our evaluations were entirely qualitative in nature, it might be harder for people who disagree with us about the effectiveness of a program to pinpoint the source of their disagreement, since our qualitative statements are more open to interpretation than our quantitative ones. Read the source article at Animal Charity Evaluators

Toolkit Helps Home Visitors Effectively and Safely Address ACEs

Parents are the key to reducing childhood trauma. And home visitors are in one of the best positions to help parents understand events of the past and how to protect their children now and in the future.

Home visitors are trained professionals who support and strengthen families in those first years of life. They talk with parents about prenatal care, infant care, child development and parenting skills and are highly skilled in building trusting relationships and creating safe spaces for meaningful conversations.

Several years ago, home visitors knowledgeable about ACEs research wanted to bring this information to families but worried about causing harm. In 2015, the NEAR@Home toolkit was launched to address these concerns and provide strategies for engaging parents in discussing ACEs in a safe, respectful and effective way for both the home visitor and family.

Since then, the free toolkit has been downloaded more than 3,500 times by people from all 50 states, Puerto Rico, District of Columbia, and 11 countries.

NEAR, the acronym for Neuroscience, Epigenetics, Adverse Childhood Experiences and Resilience, represents three decades of scientific research into the power of childhood adversity on biology, behavior and risk – and how it can be passed on to future generations.

“It is one of the largest public health discoveries of our time,” said Quen Zorrah, Thrive Washington’s NEAR@Home Facilitator and a national lead on integrating this work into home visiting programs. “Parents have the right to know the most powerful determinant of their children’s future health, safety and productivity.”

Created, reviewed and tested by home visitors, mental health providers and other experts in Region X (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington), the NEAR@Home toolkit is a training manual with guided processes to help home visitors learn and practice language and strategies to safely and effectively talk with families about the wide-ranging and long-term effects of childhood trauma — and strategies to buffer these experiences and build resilience for both the parent and child.

Talking about ACEs is not about creating excuses but understanding experiences

Research finds that parents with a history of childhood trauma will often use this new understanding of their past to begin to heal and learn how to protect their children from trauma.

“NEAR@Home has been such a profoundly meaningful tool in my practice. It has opened the door for deeper, more meaningful conversations, insights and understanding,” said Erika, a home visitor in Washington state. “One of my clients said, ‘I know those things that happened to me were really bad, but I believe they have made me a stronger and better person.’”

Because of the success of the toolkit, Region X was awarded a 2017 federal Innovation Grant through the Maternal, Infant and Early Childhood Home Visiting program to pilot an expansion across its four states.

How Philanthropy Can Help

Get informed about ACEs. Read the CDC-Kaiser Permanente Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study, one of the largest investigations of childhood abuse and neglect and later-life health and well-being. Also check out ACEs Connection, an online network supporting communities wanting to address and prevent ACEs. This site also has an online ACEs questionnaire for those wanting to discover their own ACE score.
Support the expansion of the NEAR@Home toolkit. The Region X pilot to expand and deepen use of the toolkit among home visitors is almost complete. Capacity is now needed to train and support home visitors after they’ve downloaded the toolkit. Home visiting is one of the earliest and most effective actions we can collectively take to lessen and end the intergenerational cycle of ACEs.

____

Original contribution by Molly O’Connor, Executive Vice President of External Affairs at Thrive Washington

Looking for a way to get involved?

Learning with others and benchmarking are key steps towards becoming an impact giver. If you are interested in giving with impact for Early Childhood, take a look at these events, galas, conferences and volunteering opportunities to connect with individuals like you.

Learn More

Are you ready to give?

Early Childhood is an important topic. Other members found these Giving Funds, Charitable Organizations and Projects aggregated by Giving Compass to be relevant to individuals with a passion for Early Childhood.