Giving Compass' Take:

• Research indicates that children who use the federal Food Stamp program are more likely to get an education and live longer, among other things. 

• How can this research inform other federal assistance policies for children and families? Where can donors help fill gaps for vulnerable families? 

• Learn about food assistance strategies during COVID-19. 

Researchers examined the effect of the federal Food Stamp program, now called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, on children between conception and age five over the course of their lives.

The study finds that children with greater access to economic resources before age five experience a significant increase in their adult education, are more likely to be economically self-sufficient in adulthood, live in a higher-quality neighborhood as adults, and are less likely to be incarcerated. Individuals with access to Food Stamps as children also live longer.

These numbers imply measurable returns on investments, according to the study authors. Individuals with support from food stamps or SNAP have higher lifelong earnings and are less likely to rely themselves on federal assistance or cost the public dollars due to incarceration.

That is to say, by calculating how much money a person would generate in tax revenue—as well as not relying on government assistance—the researchers found it is cheaper for the federal government to spend money upfront by providing food resources to children than not providing those resources.

“Our results show that access to food stamps in childhood has large consequences for adult well-being,” says study coauthor Martha Bailey, professor of economics and research professor in the Population Studies Center at the University of Michigan Institute for Social Research. “Our findings have important implications for current debates about the social safety net.”

Read the full article about food stamps by Morgan Sherburne at Futurity.