Giving Compass' Take:
- Laura Tomasko discusses how impact investors can work to spur transformative social change by shifting power to the communities they intend to serve.
- What can impact investors do to become more intentional about power shifting? What are the benefits of shifting power to those most affected by social issues?
- Read about why power transfers are necessary for equitable investing.
What is Giving Compass?
We connect donors to learning resources and ways to support community-led solutions. Learn more about us.
Search our Guide to Good
Start searching for your way to change the world.
We are witnessing a shift in attitudes about power. A surge of critiques about wealth inequality, accelerated by the disparities highlighted during the COVID-19 pandemic, has forced industries to reckon with their role in upholding harmful power structures. Decades of advocacy in philanthropy to shift power from grantmakers toward the communities they serve has started to take hold through practices including general operating support, multiyear grants, and participatory processes.
The same dynamics pushing philanthropy to shift power are pushing and will increasingly push impact investing. This brief argues that it should become the norm for impact investors to consider power shifting a critical form of impact. It discusses three ways impact investors can become more intentional about power shifting and closes with a discussion about implications for federal public policy. Making power shifting a central feature of impact investing should be a key goal of the sector. By shifting power, impact investors can work to overcome the critique that impact investing perpetuates the status quo and allow it to become an instrument of transformative social change.
Read the full article about power shifting by Laura Tomasko at Urban Institute.