Truth Decay: A Threat to Policymaking and Democracy

RAND Corporation
This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
Click here for more.
Truth Decay: A Threat to Policymaking and Democracy Giving Compass

Giving Compass’ Take:

• Jennifer Kavanagh and Michael D. Rich discuss the consequences of  “truth decay,” the blurring of the line between fact and fiction, on democracy and political discourse in America.

• How did the process of truth decay begin? How can donors effectively fight truth decay? 

• Learn how to fight truth decay.

The line between fact and fiction in American public life is becoming blurred. RAND has begun studying the causes and consequences of this “Truth Decay” phenomenon and how it affects democracy and political and civil discourse in the United States. Where basic facts and well-supported analyses of these facts were once generally accepted — such as the benefit of using vaccines to protect health — disagreement about even objective facts and well-supported analyses has swelled in recent years. In addition, a growing number of Americans view the U.S. government, media, and academia with new skepticism.

These developments drive wedges between policymakers and neighbors alike. This research brief describes RAND’s findings about the causes and consequences of Truth Decay and offers a research agenda for addressing the challenges this phenomenon creates, with the intent of improving policymaking and political discourse. In defining “truth decay,” we need to consider …

Heightened disagreement about facts and analytical interpretations of data. There have always been differences of opinion within the American electorate. But disagreements about objective facts and topics for which data are reasonably definitive have become increasingly common. Examples include the benefits of vaccines and the safety of genetically modified foods.

The Blurred Line Between Opinion and Fact. Changes in media content and the media business model have contributed to the jumbling of fact, fiction, and opinion. Examples include journalistic content that fails to distinguish between opinion and fact, news programs that rely on commentary rather than factual reporting without clearly labelling them, and social media platforms that allow anyone to become a source of information.

Read the full research brief about “truth decay” and how it affects democracy by Jennifer Kavanagh and Michael D. Rich at RAND.

Interested in learning more about Advocacy and Policy? Other readers at Giving Compass found the following articles helpful for impact giving related to Advocacy and Policy.

  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    Why Co-Creation is Difficult but Worthwhile [Q&A]

    Giving Compass' Take: • Co-creation is a strong method for creating programs, but it is messy and unpredictable.  • How can co-creation be used to produce better services and programs? What balance of structure and room for creativity best facilitates co-creation? • Get another perspective on co-creation from Ben Berkowitz, Chief Executive Officer of SeeClickFix. Jennifer Bradley: What does co-creation mean to you? Dennis Whittle: Co-creation is when policymakers, regulators, and program designers have conversations with the people they’re seeking to serve, both about what they’re trying to do, as well as how they intend to do it. Those conversations can lead you in directions that you have not foreseen. JB: How do you use or apply co-creation? DW: People look to us to perform a synthesis function as well as a leadership function. They want us to synthesize things that they’ve said in the past and then they want us to spend the time, and effort, and focus to think about what’s coming in the future. JB: What are some of the challenges that come with co-creation? DW: Co-creation doesn’t mean that you take inputs from everybody and throw them all in one pot. You need a chef, and people bringing ingredients, and sous chefs, and all these things have to work together. I think the trick with co-creation is having great ingredients assembled under the right conditions into a recipe that tastes great. A second set of challenges is the incentives. Usually, when you’re in a policymaking process, or especially a program-design process, you have a budget and a timetable that you’re under pressure to meet. Co-creation is messy. It’s inherently unpredictable and uncontrollable. That’s very scary when your career depends on delivering something on time, on budget, and on target. If somebody tells you to do an early childhood education project, you can’t bring back a neonatal or a childcare project. The whole program cycle that most bureaucracies have mitigates against co-creation. Read the full conversation on co-creation between Dennis Whittle and Jennifer Bradley at The Aspen Institute. 

Are you ready to give?

If you are looking for opportunities to take action and give money to Advocacy and Policy, here are some Giving Funds, Charitable Organizations and Projects aggregated by Giving Compass where you can take immediate action.

Loading...
Learn More

Sign in

Your personal information is confidential at Giving Compass. For more information, please visit our privacy policy. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use.