Giving Compass
  • Sign In
  • About Us
    About Giving Compass How We Choose Content and Organizations Annual Reflections Our Newsletter
  • Getting Started
  • Learn About Issues
    Topic Guides
    Animal Welfare COVID-19 Criminal Justice Democracy Disaster Relief Education Environment Health Homelessness Immigrants and Refugees Racial Equity Women and Girls
    Curated Articles
    Partner Collections Giving Compass Selections See All Articles
  • Give to Causes
    Issue Funds & Intermediaries Projects Nonprofits
  • Get Involved
    Philanthropy Resource Directory Events Volunteer Opportunities
  • Partner With Us
    Nonprofits Authors Use Our Content Services Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
Sign Up
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Sign In

Prison Is Bad for Kids. Why Do We Keep Sending Them There?

TeamChild Dec 7, 2019
This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
Click here for more.
Why Do We Keep Sending Kids to Prison
  •  Share
  •  Save
  • 340 shares
Share

Much has been written about our country’s problem with mass incarceration and its devastating impacts on individual lives, families and communities. Despite extensive research showing that incarceration is especially harmful for young people and doesn’t contribute to public safety1, we still detain and incarcerate children and youth, mostly for non-violent offenses. Incarceration imposes trauma, disconnects youth from their families and communities, interrupts their education and development, and compounds the stigma of a juvenile court record and court-ordered financial obligations. These setbacks can create big barriers to safe and stable housing and employment, access to health care, and independence. Prison isn’t a solution; it creates more problems.

There is a movement across the country to dismantle the structures that push youth into the deep end of the criminal justice system. Examples include successful efforts to close juvenile prisons2 and eliminate the use of local detention for non-violent offenses and for non-criminal reasons. Over the past two decades, we’ve seen a tremendous reduction in the numbers and rates of youth incarceration. Since 1997, national incarceration rates for youth under 21 years old dropped 54%. Washington State experienced an almost 60% reduction in the same time period.

Despite these reductions, there are persistent and worsening disparities for certain groups of youth due in large part to institutional racism. The Urban Institute in 2019 reported, “The movement away from youth incarceration has not benefited everyone equally, and today, compared with a decade ago, youth of color are pulled into the system and kept there at even more disproportionate levels than their White counterparts … The disproportionality cannot be accounted for by differential crime rates alone; rather, it stems from a wide range of factors including systemic inequality and differential access to prevention and diversion support.”

Right now, we have tremendous opportunities and momentum to push for an end to the use of incarceration and other punitive approaches to addressing the needs of youth. We are at or approaching our lowest numbers and rates of youth crime and youth incarceration.3 We also have greater analyses of the decision points that can either propel youth into the juvenile court system or divert them to more effective community-based supports. Increasing pathways for diversion, shifting resources and decision-making to impacted communities, and replacing punitive approaches with public health and youth development strategies are powerful catalysts for transforming the way we support young people. The strides we’ve made in Washington State reflect the kind of big shifts that we need to address disparities and discontinue the use of punitive and carceral strategies in response to youth behaviors. For example, King County shifted oversight of the juvenile detention facility away from adult corrections to public health. In 2018, we successfully advocated for a substantial expansion of state law, allowing a way for almost any juvenile criminal offense to be diverted to community-based programs rather than formal prosecution. In 2019, the WA state legislature passed a law to phase out the use of detention for youth who have not committed crimes.

The opportunities for big changes exist, but our institutions need the advocacy and engagement of communities that are most directly impacted by the failings of our current systems. Community voices can ignite and fuel bold transformative change. As legal advocates for youth, TeamChild has supported and seen the creativity, hope, and power that youth bring to create solutions to advance their goals. In our drive to end incarceration and punishment, young people need to be at the center of developing better strategies to meet their needs. When we are successful, we’ll not only be able to invest in better solutions, we’ll also eliminate the compounding negative impacts of this harmful practice, creating a better future not just for youth, but for all of us.

Some ways to get involved:
  • In addition to supporting TeamChild, consider supporting grassroots organizations in your community. (Some of our local partners include South King County Discipline Coalition and Every Student Counts Alliance.)
  • Join the cause: Connect with the National Juvenile Justice Network and No Kids In Prison to learn more about what efforts are happening where you are.
  • Support local and national legislation that decriminalizes young people and moves youth away from the court system, like The Ending PUSHOUT Act.
  • Support young people in leadership roles and listen to young people willing to share their stories and perspectives. (Check out Jazzmine’s story on our blog.)
    ____

Original contribution by Anne Lee, Executive Director and Louise McKay, Director of Investments and Partnerships at TeamChild.

Sources:

1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Justice Policy Institute.
2. Youth First Initiative and Public Welfare Foundation.
3. KidsCount.org, NPR, PrisonPolicy.org, Teen Vogue.

  •  Share
  •  Save
Share

Learning and benchmarking are key steps towards becoming an impact giver. If you are interested in giving with impact on Philanthropy take a look at these selections from Giving Compass.

  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    DataStorm: Stepping Towards Interoperability

    Giving Compass' Take: • DataStorm (via Feedback Lab) talks about how we collect data and share it, while cultivating a true spirit of collaboration across organizations. • How can we break through obstacles in achieving this interoperability? Building trust is essential. • Here are ways to make data more available and accessible. When you collaborate on writing a document or on filling in a spreadsheet on Google docs, you are doing it. When you get together in rooms to talk strategy, you are also doing a version of it. But in the first case you’re co-creating data and in the second you are trusting the other people in the room to interpret their data correctly. We are asking: What would it take to drive down the cost of team collaboration on a data level, instead of just on a strategy level (where we trust the other’s interpretation of data)? Lack of trust is a big deal. Here are just a few of the perspectives in any room of collaborators: Data Scientist: “About 90 percent of the work is cleaning data and preparing them for computers to analyze.” Aid Actor: “About 900 percent of the work is getting management to understand which numbers affect reality.” Local Change Agent: “Leaders live in their own world and their numbers don’t reflect our reality.” In today’s international development world, the local change agents are usually excluded from the room. The data people are usually called just before the meeting and again long afterwards, to prove an idea worked. Aid actors swallow up the seats and control how and when others participate. This guarantees failure. The solution is to change the way teams work together, so that everyone contributes in a meaningful way to what is created and how we define “success.” Recent efforts from USAID (Localworks) and DFID (UK Aid Connect) are heavily focused on this approach.


Looking for a way to get involved?

A good way to complement your interest in Advocacy and Policy is to connect with others. Check out these events, galas, conferences or volunteering opportunities related to Advocacy and Policy.

Loading...
Learn More

Are you ready to give?

If you are looking for opportunities to take action and give money to Advocacy and Policy, here are some Giving Funds, Charitable Organizations and Projects aggregated by Giving Compass where you can take immediate action.

Loading...
Learn More
Connect

Loading...

Loading...

Learn More
Take Action

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Learn More
More from
Giving Compass
  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    U.S. Prisons Don’t Have to Stay This Crowded
  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    Advocacy is Volunteerism
  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    Disciplinary Segregation in Prisons Linked to Recidivism
Follow Us
Newsletter

Become a newsletter subscriber to stay up-to-date on the latest Giving Compass news.

About Us
  • About Giving Compass
  • In The News
  • Contact Us
  • Content at Giving Compass
  • Partner With Us
Trending Issues
  • Environment
  • Homelessness
  • STEM Education
  • Equal Pay Act
  • Gender Equality

Copyright © 2021, Giving Compass, LLC

•
  • Privacy Policy
  • User Agreement

Sign in

Your personal information is confidential at Giving Compass. For more information, please visit our privacy policy. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use.