What is Giving Compass?
We connect donors to learning resources and ways to support community-led solutions. Learn more about us.
School meals first emerged in the U.S. at the end of the 19th century in cities like Philadelphia and Boston. These food programs were led by local nonprofits in response to rising poverty in the cities, where many jobs were low-paying and hazardous. Over the next several decades school lunches grew in popularity, especially during the Great Depression. Finally, in 1946 President Harry Truman signed the National School Lunch Act into law, which established the federally-funded National School Lunch Program (NSLP) that we still use today.
The NSLP is a vital part of the fight against child hunger in the U.S. The USDA has even added additional food programs over the years such as the School Breakfast Program (SBP) and the NSLP Seamless Summer Option (SSO). What many of these programs have in common is that they were inspired by community initiatives by those most affected by the issue (usually women and Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC)). The SBP, for example, was inspired by the Black Panther Party’s massively popular Free Breakfast for Children Program in the 1960s. The FBI actually feared the Panthers’ breakfast program more than their use of armed self-defense because it was so popular and successful in local communities. Thus, the U.S government went to work attacking them with police while simultaneously adopting a national free breakfast program of their own.
The NSLP includes approximately 100,000 participating schools serving nearly 30 million kids a day prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Public schools, nonprofit private schools, residential childcare institutions, and charter schools are all eligible for the program and participating schools receive cash reimbursements for every meal served as well as free food from the federal government (FRAC). In the 2022-23 school year, participating “high lunch” schools will be reimbursed $4.35 for free lunches, $3.95 for reduced-price lunches, and $0.79 for paid lunches. In order to receive these benefits, schools must agree to meet the FNS’s health and nutrition standards. How they meet those standards is up to each district however, and that leads us to one of the issues with the current system.
School Food Nutrition
In an effort to keep the cost of meals low amid funding cuts, many schools have turned to corporate food producers in the last several decades to provide cheap and otherwise unhealthy meals that satisfy the FNS’s rather generous nutrition standards. Some infamous examples include counting pizza sauce and french fries as a full serving of vegetables. The big food companies have spent millions of dollars to weaken or change the nutritional standards and their efforts, combined with the Trump administration’s proposals to make the rules more “flexible,” have done serious damage.
School partnerships with corporations have not only led to less healthy meals, but are also a huge marketing opportunity for companies looking to sell children on their brand of treats. While the 2010 Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act sought to address this by putting limits on the amount of fat, sugar, sodium, and calories of à la carte foods in schools, food companies just developed new recipes for existing products, kept all of the branding, and added a small label. They’re called “copycat snacks” and they’re virtually indistinguishable from their regular counterparts.
When a student doesn’t have enough money to pay for their lunch or already has debt on their account, schools will sometimes serve them an alternative (often worse) meal in an effort to make their parents pay. While the FNS requires schools participating in the NSLP to have a policy on student meal debt, it offers no guidance on what that policy should be. As a result, there is wide variation across the country when it comes to dealing with students who owe lunch money. Some of the worst policies include throwing away a student’s already-served hot meal for a cold deli sandwich or PB&J.
This practice has been labeled lunch shaming because the meals are not only less nutritious and less appetizing but can also be a source of stigma and bullying since it’s easy to see who got a cold lunch instead of the normal hot meal. Lunch debt remains an issue throughout the country, with 75% of school districts reporting outstanding student lunch debt in 2019.
How to Take Action
We have to first understand that all of these issues are interconnected and have their roots in a larger system of economic injustice and white supremacy. To address these issues at the root level, we’re demanding that school meals be fresh, culturally relevant, and free for all students. We need to get corporations out of our cafeterias and replace their generic junk food with real, nutritious meals that reflect the cultural diversity of our communities. FEEST research shows that students not only want fresh, healthy food, but that their ability to learn, retain information, participate, and collaborate in class dramatically increases when they have access to it. Read more about it in our policy memo here.
And we need these meals to be free for everyone — no exceptions. Free meals for all with proper funding for schools would make it so that cafeterias don’t have to rely on corporate partnerships to provide meals and would eliminate student lunch debt entirely. One way to do this is through the NSLP’s Community Eligibility Provision (CEP), which allows schools to provide free meals to all students if 40% or more qualify for other programs such as Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF).
Our vision for a more just school food system is not only possible, it’s already being built. What role do you want to play in finishing it?