Giving Compass' Take:
- Here are practical lessons on how philanthropy can support and empower locally-led organizations using power-sharing approaches.
- What are the barriers to power-sharing in philanthropy? What traditional philanthropic structures must we leave behind to support local solutions?
- Read more on why funders should turn over leadership to communities.
What is Giving Compass?
We connect donors to learning resources and ways to support community-led solutions. Learn more about us.
In response to the pandemic and the inequities it has brought to the surface, a new set of giving practices has been on the rise amongst philanthropists: more partnerships, fewer regulations, faster disbursement of funds, and a more conscious look at power and other social justice issues. With a growing realization of philanthropy’s power to shape social change agendas—and an aim to make better use of philanthropic funds and better address structural causes of inequity—these practices rebalance power and place decision-making authority closer to the nexus of change. For the same reasons, and in parallel, there has been a new resolve to invest more in local communities and locally-led organizations and processes.
In the field of international development, however, such initiatives are not so new. For more than a decade, the question of how to channel more assistance to recipient country entities has—albeit with some remaining questions about what constitutes locally led and how to actually fund them—become more or less standard. And while the obstacles for philanthropists are different, there is much to be learned from the efforts of other donors. For example, a 2021 report from the Overseas Development Institute reviewed bilateral and multilateral efforts to support localization and found challenges and obstacles that will be familiar to philanthropic donors: inherent power imbalances, lack of agency for local institutions, competing internal policies, perceptions of risk and lack of knowledge of local context. The same report offered up recommendations for philanthropy that will feel no less relevant: support locally led efforts that may be overlooked by other donors, model more progressive funding practices, and promote anti-racist and de-colonial practices.
While there are no roadmaps to power-sharing, there are fellow travelers on the same journey. The insights below sync up with the broad recommendations coming from the experience of donors in international development, and are meant to provide practical guidance on lifting up locally-led organizations.
- Design for the portfolio you desire (and make sure your systems reflect that design)
- Establish and learn around principles for partnership and collaboration
- Re-conceptualize risk and invest in local evidence-building capacity
- Invest in individualized plans
- Consider all the assets you can bring to a partnership
Read the full article about local philanthropy by Sarah Bouchie at Stanford Social Innovation Review.