Giving Compass' Take:
- Emmett Sanders explains the limitations and drawbacks of pretrial electronic monitoring, which fails to live up to expectations.
- What role can you play in supporting policy shifts away from harmful practices?
- Read about releasing people pretrial.
What is Giving Compass?
We connect donors to learning resources and ways to support community-led solutions. Learn more about us.
Illinois recently made history by becoming the first state in the nation to end money-based pretrial detention with the implementation of the Pretrial Fairness Act. In response, the Illinois Office of Statewide Pretrial Services announced the expansion of pretrial electronic monitoring (EM) to 70 of Illinois’ 102 counties, many of which did not have it before. While Pretrial Services touts this as something to be celebrated, the advocates who originally fought for the Pretrial Fairness Act and other scholars have pointed out that this massive expansion of state control undermines the spirit of bail reform.
The Pretrial Services agency’s statement reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of what research and evidence shows about electronic monitoring. As Michelle Alexander, legal scholar and author of The New Jim Crow, recently explained in an impassioned video, electronic monitoring is faulty technology that further embeds systemic injustices in communities of color, creates new avenues of harm, and does remarkably little to increase court compliance or public safety.
- Electronic monitoring is not evidence-based
- Electronic monitoring does not reduce jail populations
- Electronic monitoring uses faulty technology
Harms of electronic monitoring
While little evidence exists to justify the hundreds of millions of dollars spent on electronic monitoring contracts around the country each year, firsthand accounts of the harms inflicted by EM are well-documented and plentiful, with folks such as long-time researcher and activist James Kilgore leading the charge.
- Electronic monitoring creates huge financial burdens for many in already economically precarious positions
- Electronic monitoring limits access to healthcare while exacerbating or creating physical and mental health issues
Read the full article about pretrial electronic monitoring by Emmett Sanders at Prison Policy Initiative.