Giving Compass' Take:
- Heather Close discusses three prevalent myths about rural education that harm rural education funding and penalize smaller schools.
- What actions can donors take to ensure rural schools and education initiatives receive adequate funding to thrive?
- Learn more about best practices in philanthropy.
- Search our Guide to Good for nonprofits in your area.
What is Giving Compass?
We connect donors to learning resources and ways to support community-led solutions. Learn more about us.
A lack of attention paired with stereotyped ideas about what rural communities are like can harm rural education funding. "Rural education often can seem like an afterthought to policymakers and scholars. . . even though 20% of the nation’s students are educated in rural schools," write Sheneka Williams, Darren Dubose and Kimberly Clarida for The Conversation. "As scholars who study rural education, we compiled a list of three facts about rural education accompanied by the myths that would help policymakers better design programs to support rural students."
The first myth harming rural education funding is summed up in five words: "Rural communities are overwhelmingly white. . . . .While it’s true that most rural counties are majority white, these communities are becoming increasingly diverse," Williams, Dubose and Clarida explain. "Without truly understanding who resides in these communities, educators and policymakers cannot adequately address students’ needs. Failure to do so widens opportunity gaps for rural students, particularly those who reside in the South."
The second myth centers on the idea that rural communities "lack the knowledge or resources to educate their youth," they write. "Policymakers often fail to include rural communities’ cultural capital when they develop textbooks, teacher training plans and education policies. By cultural capital, we mean the knowledge, skills, education and advantages that people inherit and use to achieve success in society."
When rural cultural capital is ignored, smaller schools can suffer. In fact, the current system often penalizes rural schools for being smaller.
The third myth: The majority of rural students are underachievers. They write, "Students in rural areas meet the same measures of success as in urban ones – especially in the early years. . . . Graduation rates among rural students are higher than those of non-rural students. . . . Their academic success is too often overlooked by researchers and educators. . . . Policymakers fail these students, who have college-going rates that are lower than in urban areas."
Read the full article about rural education funding by Heather Close at The Rural Blog.