What is Giving Compass?
We connect donors to learning resources and ways to support community-led solutions. Learn more about us.
Giving Compass' Take:
• Writing for the Indianapolis Business Journal, attorney Shariq Siddiqui discusses the challenges that nonprofits face if they need to worry about the bottom line or government-based contracts: Innovation is stifled.
• How can we encourage more nonprofit organizations to embrace risk and failure? It starts with making sure they have enough resources to try out bold ideas, without worrying about losing funding if they don't work out.
When we think of the success of a not-for-profit or philanthropic institution, we look for a strategy, audited financial statements, an operations plan, dashboards for evaluation and other metrics that we perceive as assurance the institution is efficient and not misappropriating funds. Less attention is paid to whether the organization is innovating, experimenting and taking risks in the quest to make the world a better place.
President Ronald Reagan’s push to use the not-for-profit sector to serve public functions created two major problems. First, the sector’s dependence upon government fees and contracts increased greatly. Second, in his quest to reduce the size of government and create greater efficiency, Reagan actually pushed many not-for-profits to become quasi-government entities. In order to retain government funding, these not-for-profits were forced to act like semi-government entities. In that situation, innovation and experimentation are replaced by programming.
Similarly, successful individuals from the private sector come to the third sector with a lack of understanding of why it is uniquely different. The challenge the third sector faces is not that it lacks professionalism or best practices. The challenge is that social value is hard to achieve when making a profit or worrying about the bottom line. The push to make the third sector behave like the business sector is focused on the bureaucratization of business practices rather than entrepreneurial innovation.
When we examine the fiduciary responsibilities of third-sector board members, we find a failure yet again to capture the essential feature of experimentation and innovation.
Read the full article about letting nonprofits take risks by Shariq Siddiqui at Indianapolis Business News.