Giving Compass' Take:
- Eric Nee, writing for Stanford Social Innovation Review, relays three different examples of how the public sector engages in social problem-solving.
- How can philanthropists collaborate with the public sector to maximize social impact?
- Read about other examples of public sector work in addressing social issues.
What is Giving Compass?
We connect donors to learning resources and ways to support community-led solutions. Learn more about us.
All too often, social innovation leaders have given up on creating positive social change through public sector institutions, and instead focus their efforts on creating nonprofit and for-profit organizations. That is a mistake. The public sector has many more resources and much more power than the nonprofit sector, and more of a mandate to address social problems than does business.
In this issue of Stanford Social Innovation Review, we have three articles that examine ways to engage the public sector to create positive social change. One of these is our cover story, “How Philanthropy Can Create Public Systems Change,” that explores how a group of funders and nonprofits reshaped California’s higher education and prison systems.
Our Case Study, “A Community Foundation for the Nation,” takes a different look at the role of the public sector. In 1959, the French government created Fondation de France, a community foundation for the entire country that is partly governed by public sector employees and works closely with government institutions to launch and eventually take over new programs.
This model is different from most countries’, where foundations by design function independent of government. Nevertheless, Fondation de France is an interesting example of how government and philanthropy can work closely to tackle social ills.
The third article is “Codesigning Better Futures with Citizens.” Most citizens only have influence over public policy or government programs when they vote. It needn’t be that way. In Singapore, New Zealand, and France, the national government engaged ordinary people in policymaking and program design. In New Zealand, 45,000 people participated in discussions to help the national government reform its educational system, leading to new approaches to early learning, reform of vocational education, and reviews of curricula.
Read the full article about the importance of the public sector by Eric Nee at Stanford Social Innovation Review.