Giving Compass' Take:
- Katherine M. Becker details inequality in discipline in the North Carolina Department of Public Safety and offers department and policy-level solutions.
- What role can you play in supporting shifts to more equitable policies?
- Read about criminal justice reform.
What is Giving Compass?
We connect donors to learning resources and ways to support community-led solutions. Learn more about us.
Black and Indigenous people receive disproportionate disciplinary writeups in the North Carolina state prison system. As a result, incarcerated Black and Indigenous people are more likely than their white counterparts to experience disciplinary sanctions, including solitary confinement.
In this Article, I analyze data from the North Carolina Department of Public Safety. I employ two statistical techniques—binary logistic regression and multiple linear regression—to explore racial disparities in the disciplinary process. I consider disparities in overall disciplinary outcomes and disparities at several discrete moments in the disciplinary process. I show that, holding other variables constant, a Black person incarcerated in North Carolina was 10.3% more likely than a similarly situated white person to receive at least one disciplinary write-up in 2020. An Indigenous person was 13% more likely than a white person to receive a write-up. On the other hand, Latinx people and people of other races were less likely than white people to receive write-ups. Because Black and Indigenous people received disproportionate write-ups, they also received disproportionate sanctions. For example, relative to white people, Black people were 8% more likely and Indigenous people 23% more likely to be subjected to disciplinary segregation—a punitive form of solitary confinement. Explicit and implicit racial biases likely explain these disparities.
These findings support several recommendations from the landmark 2020 report by the North Carolina Task Force for Racial Equity in Criminal Justice. The Task Force advocated reforming the prison system’s handling of alleged disciplinary infractions. The proposed reforms would mitigate bias in the prison-discipline process and in adjacent processes like parole review. While these reforms are not perfect antidotes to racial bias, they would promote equity within the prison system. The present analysis suggests that the North Carolina Department of Public Safety—and, where legislative changes are necessary, the North Carolina General Assembly—should adopt, fund, and implement the proposed reforms.
Read the full article about racial bias and prison discipline by Katherine M. Becker at SSRN.