Giving Compass' Take:
- A report at Migration Policy Institute examines successes and failures in current responses to the Syrian refugee crisis, offering suggestions for improving this work in the future.
- Why is it important to look at what's working in order to fund successful initiatives for supporting refugees? How are you using your resources to offer long-term support for those affected by the Syrian refugee crisis?
- Read about how Turkey's initial support for Syrian refugees has begun to dwindle.
What is Giving Compass?
We connect donors to learning resources and ways to support community-led solutions. Learn more about us.
Ten years into Syria's violent conflict, Syrians remain the largest refugee population worldwide. The vast majority of these refugees reside in neighboring countries, with 5.5 million living in Turkey, Lebanon, Jordan, and the Kurdistani Region of Iraq (KRI) as of 2021. Many refugees in the region live in poverty and continue to face challenges accessing jobs, health care, and education, a reality that has only worsened as the COVID-19 pandemic has put health systems and local economies under significant strain.
While these challenges are complex, the humanitarian assistance and development fields have responded to refugee situations around the world with great creativity over the last decade. Initially sparked by the Syrian crisis itself and then catalyzed by the Global Compacts on Refugees and Migration, partnerships between host and donor countries, international institutions, civil society, and the private sector have brought about innovative strategies to meet the needs of both refugees and host communities.
This report from MPI and the Durable Solutions Platform offers examples of promising initiatives that promote the resilience of refugees and host communities, and examines how they might apply to the Syrian refugee context. Drawing on case studies from 16 countries on five continents, the report identifies lessons that can be learned in fostering refugee integration and social cohesion in five thematic areas: protection, social protection, education, livelihoods, and health care.
The researchers identify several common strengths among the programs examined, including strong political leadership, the engagement of civil society and nongovernmental actors, continuous support from donor institutions, and an inclusive approach that, while acknowledging the specific needs of refugees, also seeks to benefit host communities.
Read the full report about the Syrian refugee crisis at Migration Policy Institute.