Giving Compass' Take:
- Dan Zukowski examines how EVs’ expensiveness and the need for public charging make them a poor option for achieving transportation equity.
- What actions can you take to advocate for systems change towards transportation equity in your community?
- Learn more about key issues facing climate justice and how you can help.
- Search our Guide to Good for nonprofits focused on climate justice in your area.
What is Giving Compass?
We connect donors to learning resources and ways to support community-led solutions. Learn more about us.
About 100 million people in the U.S. live in disadvantaged communities, according to the TEI paper, citing the Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool. The tool was created by the Biden administration and recently taken offline by an executive order from President Donald Trump, but it remains available in an archive created by Atlas Public Policy, showing progress towards achieving transportation equity in addition to other climate and economic justice issues.
The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 highlighted inequities in transportation. While many office workers continued at their jobs from the safety of their homes, essential workers — often from low-income communities — were required to show up at their workplaces.
Transportation costs hit households in these communities the hardest: They were spending 30% of their after-tax income on transportation in 2022, compared with 12% for the highest income segment, according to data from the Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Rural households spent more of their after-tax income on transportation than those in urban areas in 2023, according to BTS.
While Biden-era policies and programs provided funding for public transit and public charging stations, disadvantaged communities may not have had the resources to apply for these grants or to acquire and maintain charging stations, the TEI paper says. The report also notes that lower-income communities often face multiple transportation-related environmental issues, such as proximity to highways and industrial pollution.
These communities often consist of diverse populations, the paper states. Direct, meaningful engagement with such communities enables residents to have a say in the transportation policies and projects that could address their specific needs, it says.
The paper provides questions to help communities and policymakers understand and evaluate transportation equity initiatives. “This holistic approach is essential for achieving truly equitable outcomes in [disadvantaged communities], ultimately bridging the gaps in access, opportunity, and environmental justice across diverse populations,” the report states.
However, whereas the Biden administration’s “Justice40” initiative explicitly directed 40% of certain federal spending to go to disadvantaged communities, the Trump administration is taking a different approach.
Read the full article about EVs and transportation equity by Dan Zukowski at Smart Cities Dive.