It is not uncommon for nonprofit executives and staff to complain about our boards of directors. How often do we become frustrated with a perceived (or real) lack of interest and/or low engagement from our boards? As employees, we tend to think they are the problem. And in some cases, that may be true.

But is it possible that we get the boards of directors we deserve?

Many nonprofit organizations give a cursory glance toward their board nominating process; some even simply go through the formality of a process. Yet a healthy nominating committee should be one of the most critical and strategic standing committees a nonprofit engages. But why is a healthy nominating committee so integral to the nonprofit’s overall health?

It’s relatively straightforward: the board candidates who are put forward now represent the strength—or weakness—of the organization’s future. Or, put another way: engaged, strong board members make a strong organization. Conversely, no matter how educated, experienced, talented, and farsighted the staff might be, unengaged board members produce a weak nonprofit.

The nominating process is vital to creating a healthy and stable nonprofit. This process should be a strategic, intentional, and ongoing priority for the nonprofit.

When building out a healthy nominating process, here are seven ideas to consider:

  1. The nominating process should be a year-round activity.
  2. The nominating committee should be an active, ongoing committee.
  3. Know what your needs are.
  4. You don’t have to personally know your nominees.
  5. Consider a trial run.
  6. Recruit not just for skill but also for temperament.
  7. A candidate doesn’t have to be asked ahead of time if they would be willing to serve.

Read the full article about board nominating processes by Rand E. Morgan at Blue Avocado.