Giving Compass
  • Sign In
  • About Us
    About Giving Compass How We Choose Content and Organizations Annual Reflections Our Newsletter
  • Getting Started
  • Learn About Issues
    Topic Guides
    Animal Welfare COVID-19 Criminal Justice Democracy Disaster Relief Education Environment Health Homelessness Immigrants and Refugees Racial Equity Women and Girls
    Curated Articles
    Partner Collections Giving Compass Selections See All Articles
  • Give to Causes
    Issue Funds & Intermediaries Projects Nonprofits
  • Get Involved
    Philanthropy Resource Directory Events Volunteer Opportunities
  • Partner With Us
    Nonprofits Authors Use Our Content Services Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
Sign Up
  • Get the Newsletter
  • Sign In

Creating Collaborative Solutions

William D. Ruckelshaus Center Sep 16, 2019
This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
Click here for more.
Creating Collaborative Solutions Giving Compass
  •  Share
  •  Save
  • 7 shares
Share

You may have noticed that public, private, and NGO sector leaders and legislators often struggle to overcome differences and reach a consensus regarding important public policy. Unfortunately, that division and discord has become increasingly more commonplace in our world.

But, progress does happen. In the Pacific Northwest, for example, contentious issues have been tackled through collaborative processes, methods, and tools. A few highlights include:

  • Protecting environmental resources on farmland, while also preserving agriculture;
  • Advancing the use of wood-based jet fuel by overcoming technical, economic, and environmental obstacles;
  • Preventing flooding while restoring salmon in the Chehalis Basin;
  • Creating consensus on residential options for the developmentally disabled;
  • Removing PCBs and other toxins from the Spokane River; and
  • Helping the State of Washington form a planning “road map” to reach its desired future.

The William D. Ruckelshaus Center has been behind these successes. In 2004, it was formed as a partnership between Washington State University (WSU) and the University of Washington (UW) to address public policy problems that are resistant to resolution through traditional policy-making processes, cost communities and institutions untold resources, and limit the ability to achieve an agenda.

Key Steps to Fostering Collaboration and Reaching Agreement

In the 15 years since the Ruckelshaus Center began, it has become a trusted third-party facilitator and mediator. The Center uses a toolkit for alternative dispute resolution and collaborative governance and draws on the impressive knowledge and resources available at its partnering universities to help diverse interests come together to create a consensus to the challenges they share. Although the Pacific Northwest is one of the pioneering regions for collaborative governance, the process has spread across the U.S. and into other countries and led to many successes. It is becoming the emerging framework for public policy and governance. This process involves the following key stages:

  • Consultation—Is a collaborative approach worth exploring?
  • Assessment—Are circumstances right? And if so, how should the process be structured?
  • Process Design—Applying the assessment to design a fair and productive process.
  • Capacity Building—Ensuring individuals and organizations are prepared to participate in a collaborative process.
  • Information Base—Establishing a set of shared facts needed to reach an agreement.
  • Facilitation/Management—Enabling groups to be more effective and reach an agreement.
  • Implementation—Implementing the agreement(s), which includes monitoring, evaluation, and adaptive management.

While the Ruckelshaus Center works diligently to create solutions to complex public policy challenges, it also works to inspire the public through its two marquee events. Each year in the spring, it hosts the Statespersonship Luncheon in partnership with the Slade Gorton International Policy Center. The event welcomes former and current political leaders as they discuss their experience and opinions on what it means to lead as a statesman or stateswoman. The Ruckelshaus Center also hosts its annual Chairman’s Circle Luncheon, which is a means to express its gratitude to its most dedicated supporters, members of its Chairman’s Circle of donors, and as a forum of knowledge for the public on topics relevant to the Center’s mission such as collaborative leadership, bipartisanship, civil discourse, and participatory democracy. Over the years, the event has featured noteworthy authors, politicians, journalists, and political analysts, from former US Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice to former British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, and NPR’s award-winning journalist and host, Robert Siegel.

Ways to Get Involved

No matter what side of the aisle you support, we understand that seeing leaders and legislators unable to come to a consensus is frustrating. Here’s how you can drive progress toward solutions:

  • If you know of a complex policy issue that needs solving, contact us.
  • Learn more about collaborative governance as a means to creating solutions for divisive issues.
  • Invest in the research and projects of the William D. Ruckelshaus Center.
  • If you’re looking for resources beyond the Pacific Northwest, check out the University Network for Collaborative Governance, the Association for Conflict Resolution’s Environment and Public Policy Section, and the National Coalition for Deliberation and Dialogue.

_______

Original contribution by Michael Kern, Director at the William D. Ruckelshaus Center.

  •  Share
  •  Save
Share

Learning and benchmarking are key steps towards becoming an impact giver. If you are interested in giving with impact on Advocacy and Policy take a look at these selections from Giving Compass.

  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    How Evidence-Based Policy Can Address Social Problems

    To help inform your impact giving about evidence-based policy, we've included the report's highlights below. For a detailed analysis, please download the PDF. Best for advanced donors. In recent decades, policymakers have grown more likely to use research evidence to guide their attempts to meet social and educational goals. Researchers have identified many reforms worthy of broad expansion, including changes in the welfare system and programs that help low-income parents foster their children’s early development. Yet despite these successes, on the whole it remains hard to implement large-scale interventions supported by evidence. Even when interventions are grounded in current knowledge and show positive effects in early tests, those effects are often modest, and they often aren’t repeated when the programs expand to other settings. Generally speaking, the prevailing paradigm for building evidence about programs or policies is a linear one: A new intervention is developed in response to a social problem. It undergoes early tests. If those tests find positive results relative to what participants would have otherwise experienced then additional impact studies are conducted in new locations (replication). If the replication studies are positive, funders will support further expansion (scaling up), expecting to see similar effects as long as future versions implement the core elements of the intervention faithfully. This pipeline paradigm is sometimes accompanied by a tiered funding model, in which more funding is made available to expand a program to a larger scale as it generates more — and more rigorous — evidence of its continued effects in more locations. This paper updates the pipeline paradigm for evidence building with a cyclical paradigm that encompasses evidence building, implementation, and adaptation. Download the full report about evidence-based policy and social change by Virginia Knox, Carolyn J. Hill, and Gordon Berlin at mdrc.org.


Looking for a way to get involved?

Learning with others and benchmarking are key steps towards becoming an impact giver. If you are interested in giving with impact for Advocacy and Policy, take a look at these events, galas, conferences and volunteering opportunities to connect with individuals like you.

Loading...
Learn More

Are you ready to give?

In addition to learning and connecting with others, taking action is a key step towards becoming an impact giver. If you are interested in giving with impact for Advocacy and Policy take a look at these Giving Funds, Charitable Organizations or Projects.

Loading...
Learn More
Connect

Loading...

Loading...

Learn More
Take Action

Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Learn More
More from
Giving Compass
  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    Why Artists’ Anti-racism Work Needs to Be Intersectional
  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    Philanthropy and Tech Sectors Can Collaborate on Ethical AI
  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    How Native Communities Are Working to Respond to COVID-19, Climate Change and More
Follow Us
Newsletter

Become a newsletter subscriber to stay up-to-date on the latest Giving Compass news.

About Us
  • About Giving Compass
  • In The News
  • Contact Us
  • Content at Giving Compass
  • Partner With Us
Trending Issues
  • Environment
  • Homelessness
  • STEM Education
  • Equal Pay Act
  • Gender Equality

Copyright © 2021, Giving Compass, LLC

•
  • Privacy Policy
  • User Agreement

Sign in

Your personal information is confidential at Giving Compass. For more information, please visit our privacy policy. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use.