Giving Compass' Take:
- Brookings explores the connection between young people's voting behavior later on in life and poverty levels, exploring whether a government cash transfer program could help motivate those in low-income households to go to the polls.
- Many young people today seem politically engaged, but the numbers say that if their parents don't vote, they don't vote either. It's essential that we set a good civic example.
- Should we lower the voting age to 16? Here are some arguments for the policy change.
What is Giving Compass?
We connect donors to learning resources and ways to support community-led solutions. Learn more about us.
Though civic organizations and politicians try to improve voter turnout — via advertising, early voting, vote-by-mail programs, “get out the vote” campaigns and voter registration efforts — some of these programs have been shown to be ineffective and to even exacerbate participation gaps.
So why don’t people vote, and how can we effectively get more people to the polls? In a new paper, my co-authors and I show that children who grow up in households that experience an increase in unearned income are more likely to vote as adults. This unearned income is a result of a governmental cash transfer program.
The paper builds off past research that suggests a strong relationship between parents’ voting behaviors and that of their children. If your parents didn’t vote, you don’t vote. Research also suggests that there is a strong relationship between household incomes (or wealth) and voting in the U.S. Simply put, poverty presents obstacles to voting and the poor vote proportionately less frequently than their richer counterparts.
Read the full article about cash transfers and civic participation by Randall Akee at Brookings.