Environmental sustainability researchers in the United Kingdom have developed a new framework for thinking about large-scale societal transformation in the face of the climate crisis. The concept is designed to help policymakers design a holistic approach to driving progress that will engage communities, restore nature, and accelerate the transition to net zero greenhouse gas emissions.

In their paper, the authors propose the concept of regenerative good growth, a concept of growth that goes beyond profit, and emphasize the importance of public engagement and agency in creating change.

For about a century, economists and politicians have held the concept of growth as the goal of policy, according to the researchers. The paper calls this dominant narrative “bad [GDP] growth,” as it often hinges solely on countries’ Gross Domestic Product (GDP), and ignores other measurements like quality of life, environmental health, and culture.

The authors assert that “bad growth” often has hidden costs associated with economic activity that, when factored in, often eliminate the benefits of economic growth. “Agriculture can look really good, but when you put in the costs of water, pollution, climate gasses, pesticide impacts on health, a whole range of other things, we find that the system ends up being in the negative space rather than positive,” Jules Pretty, first author of the study, tells Food Tank.

Regenerative good growth, in contrast, is intended to serve as a more holistic model that goes beyond financial interests, focusing on five renewable capitals. These include natural, human, social, cultural, and sustainable physical capital. Food security, togetherness, biodiversity, arts and language, housing, and collective action are just some of the authors’ proposed factors of good growth. Pretty believes that this framing can help policymakers advance growth in a way that is focused on human-centered and climate-friendly policies.

The paper proposes that to act quickly to combat the climate crisis, policymakers must give people choices. The authors use a 20-60-20 model of change. This suggests that while 20 percent of people are uninterested in the climate crisis and 20 percent are actively working against it, the 60 percent in majority are concerned but do not know how to act. The key to change is motivating the concerned-but-inactive 60 percent to engage.

Read the full article about regenerative good growth by Vincent Leggett at Food Tank.