Giving Compass' Take:
- According to research, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) isn’t adequately assessing the risk to vulnerable populations which the law mandates the agency protect.
- How can we ensure the EPA is utilizing the wealth of scientific information on exposures and susceptibility to protect health? How can we support public well-being?
- Here's how nonprofits are working to keep the EPA in line.
What is Giving Compass?
We connect donors to learning resources and ways to support community-led solutions. Learn more about us.
Many hazardous chemicals that cause health issues are still in use in industrial, commercial, and private settings, despite well-documented harms.
As the federal government implements the 2016 Frank Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act, which amends the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), experts say some of the same problems that plagued the original act are hampering progress, despite new legal requirements that promise better protection.
The TSCA legally oversees about 40,000 chemicals in the United States. The new amendments mandate protection of what the law calls susceptible and highly exposed populations, but the EPA is not adequately assessing the risk to these populations in their first 10 risk evaluations, experts write in a commentary in PLOS Biology.
In their article, Patricia Koman, research investigator in environmental health sciences at the School of Public Health at the University of Michigan, and coauthors from the University of Michigan and the University of California, San Francisco, recommend key scientific and risk assessment principles to inform health protective chemical policy.
Read the full article on the EPA and hazardous chemicals by Laurel Thomas at Futurity.