Giving Compass' Take:
- john a. powell, head of the Othering & Belonging Institute and UC Berkeley law professor, argues that equity is not enough and pushes for targeted universalism as a new framework for belonging.
- How can we shift from thinking about individuals to thinking about power structures? How can donors support organizations that target certain groups to meet their needs?
- Learn about belonging, dignity, and justice in the workplace.
What is Giving Compass?
We connect donors to learning resources and ways to support community-led solutions. Learn more about us.
john a. powell, head of OBI and UC Berkeley law professor, swiftly traces the history of (in)equality and equity in this installment of AskOBI. In doing so, he points us to next steps, but what comes next? Arguing the equity is not enough, john a. powell pushes for a new mode of thinking: targeted universalism.
john a. powell: We started in much of the world with extreme inequality. But in many of our societies and many of our lives, we’ve moved to the concept of equality. In the last 15, 20 years, we realized that equality is not enough.
People are not situated the same. You don't treat someone who is sighted and who is not sighted the same. That's maybe equality, but it's not equity.
So we move to equity. In our practice of equity, oftentimes we just focus on the disparities not realizing that even the group who's at the top of the disparities is not necessarily getting what that group deserves or needs. At the Othering & Belonging Institute and beyond, we started talking about targeted universalism.
Read the full article about targeted universalism at the Othering and Belonging Institute.