We Need More Women Building AI

The Atlantic
This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
Click here for more.
We Need More Women Building AI Giving Compass

Giving Compass’ Take:

• Lauren Smiley explains that women make up an unknown, but undoubtedly small, percentage of AI creators leading to biased programs that increase gender gaps. 

• How can philanthropy support diversity in AI creation? How can businesses increase diversity to fill vital positions and avoid inequitable AI outcomes? 

• Learn how to combat AI bias.

While women make up only a quarter of computer scientists, their numbers appear to be even smaller in the AI field in particular. While there are no government statistics on the percentage of women in AI, women at the Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), the AI field’s top conference, made up only 17 percent of attendees in 2017.

Artificial intelligence is considered the major driver of what’s known as the fourth industrial revolution (after the steam engine, electricity and mass production, and the digital eras), with major tech companies like Google, Facebook, Amazon, and Microsoft realigning around it.

Algorithms are driving ever more real-world decisions: helping doctors detect cancer; suggesting who should be released from jail, interviewed for a job, or get a loan. AI can be as biased and fallible as the humans who build it. AI has already made embarrassing mistakes, like when Google Photos auto-tagged pictures of two black people as gorillas because the algorithm, it seems, wasn’t good at correctly labeling some non-white faces. An Uber self-driving car killed a pedestrian in Arizona.

While women were fighting for full sexual agency in the real world, mostly male roboticists were creating AI-enhanced mostly female sexbots.

Programs like AI4All are no doubt drawing dozens of girls, people of color, and low-income teens into a field they otherwise wouldn’t have considered—which, in combination with other coding-focused camps, such as Black Girls Code, may start to improve diversity. Still, privately-run coding camps are not as scalable or omnipresent as, say, getting a basic coding curriculum into all junior high and high schools: The tech industry isn’t missing women and minorities in the dozens, but the tens of thousands.

Read the full article about women in AI by Lauren Smiley at The Atlantic.

Interested in learning more about Women and Girls? Other readers at Giving Compass found the following articles helpful for impact giving related to Women and Girls.

  • This article is deemed a must-read by one or more of our expert collaborators.
    Click here for more.
    Pad Power: Education and Enterprises Take Menstrual Movement to New Heights

    [Photo credit: Sarah Webb] Philanthropic efforts tend to fall into one of two models: "give the man a fish" (charity) vs. "teach the man to fish" (empowerment). Increasingly, impact-driven philanthropists understand that for truly sustainable solutions, we need to engage in more empowerment, less charity. The menstrual equity gap ­— a global crisis of women and girls enduring fear and shame because they lack access to affordable, safe, and reliable period products — is no exception. Making cheaper feminine hygiene products or handing them out for free is only part of the solution, as noted in a recent New York Times opinion piece, “Menstrual Pads Can’t Fix Prejudice.” The author, Professor Chris Bobel of the University of Massachusetts, argues that such efforts must be paired with “innovative, inclusive and culturally sensitive community-based education” to succeed.

Are you ready to give?

If you are ready to take action and invest in causes for Women and Girls, check out these Giving Funds, Charitable Organizations and Projects related to Women and Girls.

Loading...
Learn More

Sign in

Your personal information is confidential at Giving Compass. For more information, please visit our privacy policy. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use.