Giving Compass' Take:

· According to Smart Cities Dive, investing in construction workforce development and public policies for skilled labor is an effective way to build better communities around the country.

· How are public agencies achieving workforce goals? How are workforce development goals opening up career opportunities for individuals that need them most? 

· Here's more on building a skilled construction workforce. 

Is your city making the best use of taxpayer dollars spent on public works construction contracts?

If you are an employee of a state or local government working in any capacity with the public works sector of construction, there’s a chance you’ve noticed a new trend that is quickly picking up steam. Yes, prevailing wage laws have been around for decades, but they are not the only thing public agencies are monitoring these days in the compliance spectrum. Project owners are leveraging the construction industry to implement policies that have a compounded benefit to their communities, and more importantly, their residents.

More and more often, public agencies are incorporating workforce hiring requirements into their construction contracts. For those who are unfamiliar, these stipulations typically require the contractors that are awarded contracts by the agency to employ a workforce that meets certain thresholds of demographic criteria. For example, one of the more common trends that local entities push for is an increased rate of local hires.

Typically, the contracting agency sets a benchmark on a project that the contractors must meet. In this example, contractors must maintain that a certain percentage of the workers on the project must reside within the city or county in which the project takes place (alternatively, the percentage of total hours worked on the project can be used as a measure). The primary motive of the agency here would be to ensure that the residents of the community are the ones benefiting most from public funds used on this project to maximize the return on taxpayer dollars. This discourages the outsourcing of skilled labor, a not-so-uncommon tactic that some contractors might try in order to cut recruiting and hiring costs. (Remember, the use of local labor is one of the reasons the Davis-Bacon Act was created in 1931.) The benefit that the public entity realizes from these hiring requirements is compounded. Not only are stable career opportunities created for local residents, but the workers’ disposable income may contribute to the local economies and provide additional tax revenue that would have otherwise been displaced along with the transplanted workers once the project was complete.

Another commonly tracked statistical measure that is vital to the longevity of the industry’s success is that of apprentices or on-the-job trainees (OJTs). These recruits are crucial because of the industry’s dependency on new labor entering the market. As many government professionals might already be aware, one of the most common obstacles contractors face daily is obtaining and retaining a sufficient quantity of skilled labor to complete their projects on time and on budget. It has been no secret that the industry has struggled to replenish voids left by retiring workers as socio-economic pressures have increasingly influenced youth to pursue college degrees and white-collar jobs over manual labor (even despite its enticing stability and benefits). This obstacle, among a plethora of others, has kept the industry in a constant battle searching for new skilled labor to keep up with the demand for construction projects.

Read the full article about construction workforce development at Smart Cities Dive.