What is Giving Compass?
We connect donors to learning resources and ways to support community-led solutions. Learn more about us.
Giving Compass' Take:
• Kathleen Newland explains what the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly, and Regular Migration means for the future of global governance of international migration.
• How can funders work to create sustainable and humane global migration policies?
• Learn about the relationship between climate change and global migration.
In the final days of 2018, a resounding majority of states adopted the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly, and Regular Migration—the first comprehensive framework of principles and objectives to guide international cooperation on migration.
The compact emerged from a sense of crisis, with large-scale, unanticipated migration in a number of regions driving home to governments the limitations of attempting to manage such flows unilaterally. As the author of this brief notes: “States turn to international cooperation when unilateral action fails them, as it did spectacularly at the climax of 2015, and they are convinced that their goals are more likely to be reached by collaborating with others.”
The adoption of the compact in December 2018 was the culmination of a drama that unfolded in twists and turns. Since the UN General Assembly announced in 2016 that such a compact was to be crafted, negotiators have grappled with how to reconcile the interests of origin, transit, and destination countries, and the compact has had to withstand virulent criticism that it threatens national sovereignty.
In reality, as the brief explores, the kind of collaboration outlined in the compact promises to give states tools to reinforce their sovereignty—to better control how and under what conditions migration happens, improving outcomes for both states and the migrants involved. Looking ahead, the effectiveness of the nonbinding document will depend largely on the steps governments take to implement their commitments under the compact, and to support others in doing so.
A sense of crisis often shakes up conventional ways of responding to a stimulus. The reactions to crises may be positive or negative, and the 2010-19 period has seen plenty of both in relation to migration: extraordinary generosity toward migrants and refugees at national, community, and individual levels as well as rejection and vilification. Neither is new. But this decade has produced one unpreceded response to migration: the first formal framework, negotiated and adopted by an overwhelming majority of states, of principles and objectives to guide international cooperation on migration.