What is Giving Compass?
We connect donors to learning resources and ways to support community-led solutions. Learn more about us.
Giving Compass' Take:
• Jennifer J. Freyd, professor of psychology at the University of Oregon, explains how institutions often fail to protect and support sexual assault victims.
• How can funders work to hold institutions accountable and help them dismantle the power imbalances that disadvantage victims of sexual assault?
• Learn about alarming attitudes toward sexual assault.
A 27-year-old medical resident in general surgery is sexually harassed by two men — the chief resident and a staff physician at the hospital. She feels trapped. When one of the men’s actions escalates to assault, she struggles to find the strength and courage to report it.
When she finally does, will the outcome harm her even more?
The story, a fictional composite based on real accounts in our research, is agonizingly familiar. The outcome is often worse. When sexual harassment and assault occur in the context of an institution — a school, the military, a workplace — the behavior of institutional leaders can become a powerful force in how the victim fares.
From Susan Fowler’s poor treatment by Uber’s human resources department to the silence of non-abusive men in Harvey Weinstein’s orbit, our most powerful institutions often act without courage.
Over 25 years, my students and others have amassed a substantial body of empirical work revealing the real psychological and physical harm that institutions can do to those they betray.
However, if institutions want to do the hard work, they can help victims and prevent violence in the first place — by choosing courage instead of betrayal.
My colleagues and I first introduced the term institutional betrayal in 2007, and have since explored it further, including in a book, “Blind to Betrayal.”
Institutional betrayal is harm an institution does to those who depend upon it. This betrayal can take the form of overt policies or behaviors, such as discriminatory rules or genocide.
Harm can also mean failing to do that what is reasonably expected of the institution, such as not providing relief to disaster victims or failing to respond effectively to sexual violence. For instance, some victims of assault are punished or even demoted or fired for reporting the assault to their institution.
In our studies, we found that more than 40 percent of college student participants who were sexually victimized in an institutional context did also report experiences of institutional betrayal.
Read the full article about sexual assault victims betrayed by institutions by Jennifer J. Freyd at The Conversation.